Olduvaiblog: Musings on the coming collapse

Home » Liberty » Digital surveillance won’t drive me off social media: Lauren O’Neil – Community – CBC News

Digital surveillance won’t drive me off social media: Lauren O’Neil – Community – CBC News


Digital surveillance won’t drive me off social media: Lauren O’Neil – Community – CBC News.

CBC social media producer is an avowed ‘internet addict’

By Lauren O’Neil, CBC News Posted: Mar 07, 2014 5:00 AM ET Last Updated: Mar 07, 2014 5:00 AM ET

Lauren O'Neil is a producer on the Community desk of CBC News and a self-professed 'internet addict.'Lauren O’Neil is a producer on the Community desk of CBC News and a self-professed ‘internet addict.’ (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

I was 12 years old when I published my first blog post.

 

It was 1996 and, at the time, my biggest concern was that one of my parents would pick up the phone and kill our 14K modem’s connection to the internet while I was uploading images.

 

The concept of digital privacy didn’t even register in my mind – I was simply thrilled to put my thoughts and face on the web for the entire world to see.

 

A lot has changed since then, technologically speaking, but my desire to share my life online has never wavered. In fact, it’s only grown stronger with the advent of social networks, micro-blogging and, most significantly, smartphones.

 

Today, I live out much of my personal life through my iPhone and laptop. I communicate with my friends through Facebook Messenger, post photos of my daily adventures on Instagram and even publish blog posts through WordPress while I’m on the streetcar sometimes.

‘As this project shows, I’m revealing quite a bit more [about myself] than I’d expected.’– CBC News social media producer Lauren O’Neil

 

I tweet out jokes, musings, fun links and photos constantly – almost compulsively – and probably upload more selfies than is considered socially acceptable. I’ve also got a YouTube channel, a Tumblr blog, multiple Gmail addresses and accounts with Google+, Rdio, SoundCloud, Netflix, Pinterest and Foursquare.

 

As an associate producer on the Community desk for CBC News, I write multiple blog posts a day, host a weekly online chat show and sometimes appear on television to speak about internet-related things.

 

When my colleagues approached me to take part in a project tracking my daily surveillance habits, I was curious to see just how much information I’m giving away. Suffice it to say, I’m quite comfortable putting myself out there.

 

What I’m not comfortable with is the idea of anyone gaining access to information I haven’t explicitly made public – and as this project shows, I’m revealing quite a bit more than I’d expected.

 

The extent of online tracking

 

When I was first told about this project, I assumed that my online activity was being tracked at least a little bit.

 

I understood that leaving my iPhone’s GPS on would geolocate my Instagram photos, that checking into the gym on Foursquare could activate nearby marketing promotions and that third-party Twitter apps had access to my email address and other data I’d provided.

 

Surveillance interactiveClick on the graphic above to see an interactive on how we are digitally tracked on a daily basis. (CBC)

 

 

I was even aware that Facebook was selling my data to marketers – hey, that’s the price you pay for a free (and, to my mind, essential) service.

 

What shocked me was how much of my personal, private information could be accessed by the government and corporations through simple activities such as buying a coffee or checking my RSS feed over breakfast.

 

Every email and tweet I send contains metadata such as the date, time and subject of the message, as well as the IP address from which it was sent. With the amount of personal data I push through my iPhone every hour, it means I could be tracked down at almost any time of the day.

It’s scary to think about what could happen if that information came into the wrong hands.

 

Something else I’d never really considered was how vulnerable I was making myself by using public Wi-Fi networks, which can be insecure. Sure, I might save a few bucks on my wireless bill, but is it worth the risk of giving third-party corporations or even malicious hackers access to my data?

 

Participating in this project has opened my eyes to how much information I’m involuntarily sharing with marketers, the Canadian government and potentially even U.S. authorities.

 

But while privacy is important to me, so is communicating with my peers, having a creative outlet and contributing to the online culture I so deeply love and respect.

 

Without sharing so much of my life through the Internet, I wouldn’t be where I am professionally. I’d also have missed out on some of great social, creative and career opportunities.

 

The rewards outweigh the risks… for now. That said, I’ll definitely be turning off my iPhone’s GPS function. It’s a small but necessary step.

Advertisements

1 Comment

  1. My comment:
    “The rewards outweigh the risks… for now.” Herein lies part of the problem. The positive feedback garnered from others online and the lack of awareness of how such information can be used against a person for nefarious reasons. Change usually begins on the periphery, not the core. If one is using the Internet solely for self-gratification and communication, then the-powers-that-be will probably just record and save all that data. However, start being more critical of government narratives, standing up for liberty and freedom from government intrusions into privacy, even declaring one an environmentalist, and you can bet your communications will come under greater scrutiny (I have little doubt mine have). Just look at how environmental and Native groups have been demonised by our politicians, even to the point of referring to them as terrorists. You can bet their online communications are being monitored and used for less than transparent reasons. Just because the-powers-that-be haven’t identified your online data as ‘problematic’ doesn’t mean it won’t at some point. I’ll close with a poem by Martin Niemoller regarding the rise of German Nazism:
    First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out– Because I was not a Socialist.
    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out– Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out– Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me–and there was no one left to speak for me.
    Lauren, as a self-professed Internet ‘addict’, you should be one of the people standing on a hilltop shouting as loudly as possible about digital surveillance and its perils. Your dismissal of this (e.g. the rewards outwieigh the risks) is truly problematic.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 314 other followers

  • 56,188
March 2014
S M T W T F S
« Feb   May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives