Olduvaiblog: Musings on the coming collapse

Home » Collapse » Former central banker: “[Bankers] are making it up as they go along.”

Former central banker: “[Bankers] are making it up as they go along.”

Former central banker: “[Bankers] are making it up as they go along.”.

March 3, 2014
London, England

[Editors note: Tim Price, Director of Investment at PFP Wealth Management and frequent Sovereign Man contributor is filling in for Simon today.]

A few weeks ago, William White (former economist at the Bank of England, the Bank of Canada, and Bank of International Settlements) made a frank admission.

And while we search for assets whose prices are less obviously distorted by malign government intervention, it’s refreshing to hear a mea culpa from a member of the economics “profession”.

White said:

“The analytical underpinnings of what we [mainstream economists] do are actually pretty shaky. A reflection of that fact, is that virtually every aspect you can think of with respect to monetary policy, about best practice, has changed and changed repetitively over the course of the last 50 years. So, this stuff ain’t science.

“Think about what’s happened recently. One, its completely unprecedented. People are making it up as they go along. This is hardly science – building on the pillars of the past.

“Secondly, what they’ve been making up as they go along actually differs across central banks [The Bundesbank, for example, is fighting the threat of high inflation, whereas the Fed is more concerned about the prospect of deflation]. They can’t even agree amongst themselves about what’s the best way to do things.

“I’m becoming more and more convinced that all of the models we use are basically useless.

“It’s surprising that we’ve had this huge crisis that the mainstream didn’t predict. It’s gone on for years, which the mainstream absolutely didn’t predict. I would have thought this was a basis for a fundamental rethink about what we used to think we believed. But that hasn’t happened.

“The policies that we’ve followed – on the monetary side at least – since 2007 are just more of the same demand-stimulating policies that we’ve been following, I think, erroneously, for the last 30 years.

“We’ve got the potential to do so much harm by not getting the creation of fiat credit and money right. We’ve got the capacity to do so much harm that we should be focusing much more on making sure that doesn’t happen.”

[End quote]

Doctors at least have the Hippocratic Oath: first, do no harm. If only economists and central bankers had a similar ethic.

But they don’t. So they continue ‘making it up as they go along’, as Mr. White suggests, applying failed ideas with impunity and continued authority to an unquestioning public.

Warren Buffett famously compared financial markets to the card table, observing that if you’ve been playing poker for half an hour and you still don’t know who the patsy is, then you’re the patsy. It seems we are all patsies now.

You can listen to the full interview here:


  1. thetinfoilhatsociety says:

    The biggest problem with economics is that, in my opinion, they base their ‘science’ on imaginary foundations. Only in economics would resources (and resource depletion) be considered an ‘externality’ that has nothing to do with the flow of money. Idiots, the lot. If economics were based on ecological models, it might actually make sense and be able to actually do some good. At least ecological models are based on real world examples…

    • I don’t know of any ‘model’ that can truly represent the complexity of the real world. I would suggest, however, Steve Keen’s book (Debunking Economics) for some insight into what he considers better modelling.

      • thetinfoilhatsociety says:

        I haven’t read his book but I have listened to more than a few podcasts featuring Mr. Keen. I agree, he also posits better modeling than what currently exists. And I also agree, models will never fully represent the complexity of the real thing, but I am sure that the understanding of an ecological system that is currently possessed is better and of more use concerning real world economies than what passes for models economists currently use. After all, an economy has an ecology.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 313 other followers

  • 71,632
March 2014

Top Clicks

  • None